top of page

INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES > DIAGNOSTICS & MEDTECH

The Diagnostics Gap: When Public Health Policy Outpaces Laboratory Infrastructure

By

Jamie Platt

CEO, Pictor

Op-Ed

February 2, 2026

Healthcare Insights is a life sciences newsletter, healthcare business magazine, and think tank covering emerging biopharmaceutical and biotechnology innovation, sector insights, advanced industry analysis, and impact across the healthcare field. Learn more about our mission, and subscribe to The Letter, our weekly newsletter covering the latest in healthcare and biotech, to get our latest in your inbox.

Editor's Note: This feature is part of our Industry Perspectives seriesa curated forum for healthcare and business leaders to share strategic foresight on clinical and capital trends. The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views or position of Healthcare Insights. To maintain editorial integrity, all guest contributions undergo rigorous internal review. You may learn more about our standards or about submitting an Industry Perspectives piece here.

February 2, 2026

As public health mandates continue to evolve, the value of a diagnostic platform will be measured by its flexibility, scalability, and multi-analyticity. In our latest piece, Dr. Platt explains why.

Public health policy frequently exposes structural gaps in healthcare delivery. The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recent mandate to expand post-vaccination antibody testing for Hepatitis B represents a critical inflection point. It signals a shift from an era of assumed immunity to an era of verified immunity—a transition that our current diagnostic infrastructure is ill-equipped to handle.


The Verification Mandate

Despite decades of widespread vaccination, Hepatitis B remains a persistent clinical blind spot. With an estimated 2.4 million Americans living with chronic HBV, and many undiagnosed, the ACIP’s updated guidance is a necessary move toward population-level risk management. However, moving from "assumption of protection" to "diagnostic verification" creates an immediate operational bottleneck. For clinical laboratories and health systems, this is not merely a clinical update; it is a scaling crisis. Incomplete vaccination records, waning immunity, and limited post-vaccination testing continue to complicate prevention efforts, especially in high-risk populations. The ACIP’s updated guidance underscores the need for verification rather than assumption of immunity.


Antibody testing is increasingly recognized as essential for clinical decision-making, guiding booster strategies, and reducing transmission risk. Implementing this guidance, however, reveals longstanding limitations in laboratory workflows.


The Labor-Operational Friction

The mandate for expanded testing arrives as the diagnostic sector faces a historic labor shortage. According to the American Society for Clinical Pathology, high vacancy rates for laboratory professionals have reached a tipping point.


Conventional HBV testing relies on single-analyte assays, requiring separate workflows, additional sample volumes, and significant hands-on time. In a healthcare system focused on "Value-Based Care," the traditional "one-test, one-vial" model is no longer economically or operationally sustainable. Without a shift in diagnostic methodology, well-intentioned policy will inevitably lead to diagnostic friction and delayed patient outcomes.


Targeted Proteomics: A Systemic Solution

Bridging this gap requires a departure from traditional immunodiagnostics toward Targeted Proteomics. By detecting multiple immune markers from a single, low-volume sample, laboratories can consolidate workflows and deliver broader clinical insights without increasing headcounts.


This approach supports a system-level testing model, enabling a single assay to inform multiple public health and clinical decisions. It aligns with key healthcare priorities, including early detection, integrated screening programs, and resource-efficient laboratory operations. From a market perspective, the ability to adapt to policy changes, scale efficiently, and support multiple analytes is increasingly viewed as a differentiator for laboratories and diagnostic platforms.


Case Study: ViraScreen-Core™ and the Future of Screening

The ViraScreen-Core™ assay best illustrates the application of Targeted Proteomics in infectious disease. By detecting antibodies for HBV, HIV-1, HIV-2, and HCV from a single sample, the platform transforms a routine screen into a comprehensive infectious disease profile.


Critically, the move toward non-invasive sampling (utilizing both serum and saliva) addresses the "equity gap" in public health. Non-invasive options reduce logistical complexity and improve compliance in pediatric and community health settings, where traditional phlebotomy acts as a barrier to entry.


The Institutional Path Forward

The ACIP guidance on Hepatitis B is a bellwether for the future of diagnostics. As public health mandates continue to evolve, the value of a diagnostic platform will be measured by its flexibility, scalability, and multi-analyticity.


The gap between policy expectations and diagnostic capacity can only be closed through innovation that prioritizes laboratory efficiency. Targeted proteomics offers that pathway, moving the industry toward a model where comprehensive insight is the standard, not the exception.



About the Author: Dr. Jamie Platt is CEO of Pictor and has more than 20 years of experience in genomics and molecular diagnostics. She has led the development and commercialization of high-complexity diagnostic tests globally and serves on the boards of DxTerity and bioAffinity Technologies. Jamie is a recognized voice in the diagnostics field, focused on advancing clinically meaningful, accessible testing that delivers real-world value for laboratories and health systems. Find her on LinkedIn.


Disclaimer: This contribution is part of Healthcare Insights’ Industry Perspectives series. It was selected for publication based on its contribution to the dialogue surrounding renal innovation. Healthcare Insights does not endorse specific medical devices but provides a platform for industry leaders to share data-driven foresight. None of the information in this article should be construed as medical, financial, legal, or professional advice. Learn more about our terms and policies at healthcarein.org/legal.

OUR LATEST INSIGHTS

What policymakers frame as a cost-saving measure will be felt by scientists working on life-saving discoveries and patients who desperately need them.

“It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary [RFK Jr.]”, C.B.E.R. Director Peter Marks wrote in a letter to the FDA.

The new role shoulders the weight of overseeing both Medicare and Medicaid, programs that provide essential health coverage to millions of Americans. 

image.png
image.png
image.png

NEWSLETTER

Stay in the loop.

bottom of page